Articles Posted in Texas Laws

Motions to suppress in Texas criminal cases play a critical role to put it mildly. Understanding their significance and knowing how to utilize them effectively is crucial for anyone charged with a serious crime. In this post, we will explore the definition and importance of motions to suppress, the legal grounds for filing such motions in Texas, the process of filing them, the role of defense attorneys in this process, and the potential consequences of successful and unsuccessful motions to suppress.

Understanding Motions to Suppress

Before delving into the intricacies of motions to suppress, it is essential to grasp their fundamental definition. In criminal cases, motions to suppress can be filed when there is reason to believe that certain evidence presented against the defendant was obtained illegally or in violation of their constitutional rights. The primary purpose of these motions is to exclude such evidence from being used against the defendant in court.

The significance of motions to suppress cannot be overstated. They can be the difference between a conviction and an acquittal. When successful, these motions effectively render the unlawfully obtained evidence inadmissible, weakening the prosecution’s case and providing the defendant with a much better chance at trial. In many cases, the prosecution will be forced to withdraw some or all of the charges if a motion to suppress is granted.

What Is a Motion to Suppress?

Motions to suppress are legal requests made by the defense to exclude specific evidence from being used against the defendant in a criminal trial. These motions argue that the evidence in question was obtained illegally or in violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights.

Continue reading

As Forney criminal defense attorneys, the lawyers at Guest & Gray play a pivotal role in investigating, preparing and litigating motions to suppress. Motions to suppress are responsible for protecting our clients’ rights and ensuring a fair trial. Thus, our assistance can make a significant difference in the outcome of the motion and your overall case.

Selecting the Right Defense Attorney for Your Case

Choosing the right defense attorney is paramount in motions to suppress. It is essential to select an attorney with a proven track record in handling similar cases and a strong understanding of the intricacies involved. A capable defense attorney will thoroughly evaluate the circumstances surrounding the alleged constitutional violations and provide the needed guidance throughout the entire process. The experienced defense attorneys at Guest and Gray possess an in-depth understanding of criminal law and the constitutional protections afforded to individuals. We can identify potential grounds for filing a motion to suppress, gather evidence to support our clients’ claims, and craft persuasive arguments to present in court. Our expertise plays a crucial role in shaping the outcome of your case.

The Consequences of Successful and Unsuccessful Motions to Suppress

The consequences of both successful and unsuccessful motions to suppress can significantly impact the outcome of a criminal case. Understanding these implications is vital for defendants and their legal teams.

Continue reading

Criminal cases can be complex legal matters, and understanding the various aspects involved is crucial. One such aspect is the concept of a statute of limitations, which plays a significant role in determining the timeliness of criminal prosecutions in Texas. It is essential to have a clear understanding of what a statute of limitations entails, how it impacts criminal cases in Texas, and the exceptions that may apply. This article will explore these topics in detail, shedding light on the intricacies of the Texas penal code and its relationship with the statute of limitations.

Understanding the Concept of a Statute of Limitations

Before delving into the specifics of the Texas penal code, it is vital to grasp the fundamental concept of a statute of limitations. In simple terms, a statute of limitations is a time limit imposed by the law, determining the maximum period within which legal proceedings must be initiated after a crime has been committed.

This legal principle aims to strike a balance between the right of the state to prosecute offenders and the rights of individuals to be free from the fear of prosecution for an indefinite period. By imposing time limits, the statute of limitations ensures that evidence is still fresh and available, witnesses’ memories are reliable, and defendants have a fair chance to mount a defense.

Continue reading

In the world of criminal defense, every case presents its unique challenges and complexities. One such case that recently caught our attention is State v. Ransier, which involved an allegation of tampering with evidence. This blog post aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the case, highlighting the significance of evidence concealment and the implications it had on the final verdict.

The Facts of the Case

The incident took place in March 2015, when DPS Trooper David Kral noticed a parked truck by the roadside during an investigation. As he approached, he observed the defendant, who seemed to be concealing something in his hand. Upon closer examination, Trooper Kral discovered it was a syringe that the defendant was attempting to break and hide. The trooper ordered the defendant to drop the syringe, but he continued his efforts to conceal it. Subsequently, Trooper Kral intervened, leading to a physical altercation that resulted in the defendant falling to the ground, with the syringe dropping nearby.

Trial and Appeal

the defendant was charged with tampering with evidence for concealing the syringe. During the trial, the defense argued for the submission of the lesser-included offense of attempted tampering. However, the request was denied, and the defendant was ultimately convicted of tampering with evidence. On appeal, the court of appeals concluded that the lesser-included offense of attempted tampering was raised, emphasizing that the syringe was only partially concealed during the altercation. Continue reading

In the state of Texas, understanding the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor is crucial when it comes to the legal system. Criminal offenses are categorized into these two broad classifications, each carrying its own set of implications and consequences. By delving into the basics of criminal offenses and exploring the classification of felonies and misdemeanors, we can gain a deeper understanding of the legal landscape. However, when it comes to defending against felony or misdemeanor charges, it is important to have an experienced criminal defense attorney by your side.

Felonies vs. Misdemeanors

Felonies are serious crimes that typically involve physical harm to individuals or property and significantly a higher risk to public safety. Examples of felonies include murder, rape, robbery, and drug trafficking.

A misdemeanor covers less serious offenses that are not as severe as felonies. Misdemeanors generally involve actions that are considered detrimental to society but do not pose as grave a threat as felony offenses. Examples of misdemeanors include petty theft, simple assault, and the possession of certain types of drugs in low quantities.

Continue reading

In the legal landscape of Texas, the question of whether children can testify in a criminal case is an important one. Children’s brains are still developing and they don’t always have a firm a grasp on the difference between the truth and a lie. Not only that, but some children may not understand the importance of being truthful, even if they know the difference. And, of course, there is always the very real possibility that an interested adult influences a child’s testimony. Needless to say, the ability of a child to provide testimony can significantly impact the outcome of a case, so it is crucial to understand the laws and processes involved.

Understanding the Legal Age of Testimony in Texas

When it comes to testifying in a criminal case, the age of the child plays a significant role. In Texas, there is no specific age requirement for a child to testify. Rather, the criterion for determining a child’s competency to testify is their ability to understand and answer questions truthfully.

Testifying in court can be a daunting experience for anyone, let alone a child. Therefore, the Texas legal system takes into account various factors when deciding whether a child is capable of providing reliable testimony. One such factor is the child’s intellectual capacity. The court assesses whether the child possesses the cognitive abilities necessary to comprehend and respond to questions accurately.

Continue reading

Speaking to detectives without legal representation exposes you to unnecessary risks. The consequences can be severe and often outweigh any perceived benefits of cooperating with the investigation. However, as experienced Forney criminal defense attorneys, we routinely see detectives engaging in questionable interrogation tactics that mislead unsuspecting people into making statements that are later used against them. Sometimes, prosecutors will even take your statements out of context to make it seem as though you were admitting to something you had no intention of admitting.

At Guest & Gray, anytime we receive a case involving a statement our client made to detectives, one of the first things we do is determine if the statement was taken in violation of their constitutional rights. If so, it isn’t admissible at trial.

Below are some of the most important reasons not to talk to a detective until you’ve spoken with a criminal defense attorney.

Potential Misinterpretation of Statements

During police interviews, statements made by individuals may be misinterpreted or taken out of context, leading to potential legal ramifications. Even innocent statements can be misconstrued and used against a person during a trial.

Continue reading

In the world of criminal law, two legal terms frequently make headlines but are often misunderstood: insanity and incompetence. While these terms may seem interchangeable, they carry distinct meanings and implications within the legal system.

For individuals facing criminal charges in Rockwall, Texas, it is crucial to comprehend the difference between these concepts. In this blog post, we will delve into the contrasting notions of insanity and incompetence, shedding light on their definitions, legal implications, and how they affect criminal defense strategies.

The Insanity Defense: A State of Mind

Insanity, as a legal concept, revolves around an individual’s mental state at the time of committing a crime. To be considered legally insane, the defendant must have been unable to comprehend the nature of their actions or distinguish right from wrong due to a severe mental illness or defect. This defense suggests that the defendant lacked the mental capacity to form the requisite intent or engage in criminal behavior knowingly. However, it’s important to note that the insanity defense is rarely invoked and, when used, faces significant scrutiny and strict requirements in the courtroom.

Continue reading

In a recent case coming out of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the defendant claimed that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial. He was originally convicted of murder and tampering with evidence, and he argued that too much time passed between the charge and the conviction. While the court originally found it was unable to review the defendant’s claim, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals issued an opinion telling the lower court it had to make a decision one way or the other, sending the case back down for review.

Facts of the Case

According to the opinion, the defendant was charged and convicted, but he appealed quickly on the grounds that he was denied the right to a speedy trial. Under both the U.S. and Texas Constitutions, an individual is guaranteed the right to have a “speedy” public trial. While the word “speedy” is up for interpretation, courts look to see whether an unreasonable amount of time passed between the charge and conviction when analyzing a speedy trial claim.
Here, the defendant said he waited too long for his trial to take place, and thus that the guilty conviction should be vacated. Originally, the appellate court disagreed and kept the verdict in place. The defendant, however, filed a petition asking for a review of the appeals court’s decision.

The Decision

The reviewing court looked at the appellate court’s decision to determine whether or not it was correct in denying the defendant’s claim. Apparently, said the reviewing court, the court of appeals had denied the claim because the lower court had failed to conduct a “speedy trial hearing.” The appellate thought it did not have enough evidence to decide the case since there was no hearing specifically on this issue in the lower court. Therefore, the court had denied the defendant’s request.

Continue reading

Abortion has always been a hot-button political issue in Texas, where state legislators have taken great efforts to restrict or outlaw most abortions whenever possible. The United States Supreme Court issued a legal decision in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson in June of 2022. This ruling reversed the landmark decision of Roe v. Wade, which guaranteed women the right to terminate a pregnancy during the first four months of the pregnancy. With this new decision on the books, the ability for women to have a safe, legal abortion in Texas is at risk

The Texas legislature has already passed what is known as a “trigger law,” which is designed to go into effect to outlaw abortion if the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Under the law, which is set to go into effect before August 1, 2022, anyone performing or assisting with abortion would be guilty of a felony punishable by prison time. Texas news organizations have reported that abortions have come to a halt in Texas already, with doctors fearing criminal liability for performing abortions even before the trigger law goes into effect.

Although the advocates for the trigger law argued that it was not designed to punish women seeking an abortion, and only doctors performing one, the language of the law could be amended to allow women to be prosecuted for assisting in their own abortion. Although nobody has been charged under this law yet, once it goes into full effect, many Texas healthcare providers may be at risk of criminal liability.

Contact Information